Re: The case for version number inflation

On 1 March 2013 19:38, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
>
>>> We've always picked version numbers after we had the feature list. What
>>> features do you feel are on the fence? I had the impression that
>>> logical replication, for example, was pretty far from being done.
>>
>> I think we need to avoid making decisions based upon impressions and
>> spend more time looking at facts, but that is beside the point.
>
> Who's making decisions? AFAICT, you and Andres have made most of the
> descisions on SLR to date. I haven't been involved, and am unlikely to
> become so, unless SLR reaches the stage of doing beta testing. So I'm
> really unclear on what you're accusing me of, or why you are doing it.

Josh, for some reason I missed this post earlier, just seen because of
other posts.

I meant my words as a general comment, so not an accusation of any
kind. Since you took it that way, I apologise, especially so since I
ignored your post.

To explain myself further, its difficult to know what will be in or
out of a release until at-least technical triage has been performed on
work to gain facts. Some things are further forward than might be
expected, others disappointingly not ready even after lots of work.

--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services