Re: The case for version number inflation

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: The case for version number inflation
Date: 2013-04-02 11:09:38
Message-ID: CA+U5nM+GaKz_ET_fQ1eFNUMDbLbciKbC0sUAtoQPthRk7WcHSw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

On 2 March 2013 01:16, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
> Related to this:
>
> Apparently MariaDB is arbitrarily bumping their next release up to
> version 10 in order to jump "ahead" of Oracle MySQL. It seems not a
> coincidence that they chose a major version number one ahead of Postgres.

There's a joke about data loss there somewhere...

--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message damien clochard 2013-04-02 21:41:46 Heroku early upgrade is raising serious questions
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2013-04-02 11:07:36 Re: The case for version number inflation