Re: wal_sender_delay (WalSndDelay) has served its purpose

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: wal_sender_delay (WalSndDelay) has served its purpose
Date: 2011-08-10 21:29:22
Message-ID: CA+U5nMKbPJ-Jk6t7DCT8r4meTTLaGCuxuEwiq5tg7ip_oNpoZw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 10:23 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:

> AFAICS we could get rid of WalSndDelay: there is no longer any reason
> for the walsender loop to wake up unless it's received a latch event.
> (Its WaitLatch call is missing WL_POSTMASTER_DEATH right now, but that
> is easily fixed.)  Is anyone sufficiently attached to that GUC to not
> want to see it go away?

Please remove.

--
 Simon Riggs                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dimitri Fontaine 2011-08-10 22:01:55 Re: mosbench revisited
Previous Message Tom Lane 2011-08-10 21:23:43 wal_sender_delay (WalSndDelay) has served its purpose