On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 5:29 PM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 10:23 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
>> AFAICS we could get rid of WalSndDelay: there is no longer any reason
>> for the walsender loop to wake up unless it's received a latch event.
>> (Its WaitLatch call is missing WL_POSTMASTER_DEATH right now, but that
>> is easily fixed.) Is anyone sufficiently attached to that GUC to not
>> want to see it go away?
>
> Please remove.
+1!
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company