From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Dickson S(dot) Guedes" <listas(at)guedesoft(dot)net> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Separating bgwriter and checkpointer |
Date: | 2011-10-18 13:18:26 |
Message-ID: | CA+U5nMKV8sVoX=Qp+-B4fsjTx5RBE2BgPwmviALfSE5Pm4v1UQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 8:02 AM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 5:10 AM, Dickson S. Guedes <listas(at)guedesoft(dot)net> wrote:
>
>> Ah ok! I started reviewing the v4 patch version, this is my comments:
>
> ...
>
>> Well, all the tests was running with the default postgresql.conf in my
>> laptop but I'll setup a more "real world" environment to test for
>> performance regression. Until now I couldn't notice any significant
>> difference in TPS before and after patch in a small environment. I'll
>> post something soon.
>
> Great testing, thanks. Likely will have no effect in non-I/O swamped
> environment, but no regression expected either.
Any reason or objection to committing this patch?
--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2011-10-18 13:26:02 | Re: new compiler warnings |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2011-10-18 13:09:13 | Re: new compiler warnings |