| From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Dickson S(dot) Guedes" <listas(at)guedesoft(dot)net> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Separating bgwriter and checkpointer |
| Date: | 2011-10-05 07:02:15 |
| Message-ID: | CA+U5nM+-az=FXLnJUsEorTZSsapA=eOCG+HKBWo-hxpAVTH6Zw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 5:10 AM, Dickson S. Guedes <listas(at)guedesoft(dot)net> wrote:
> Ah ok! I started reviewing the v4 patch version, this is my comments:
...
> Well, all the tests was running with the default postgresql.conf in my
> laptop but I'll setup a more "real world" environment to test for
> performance regression. Until now I couldn't notice any significant
> difference in TPS before and after patch in a small environment. I'll
> post something soon.
Great testing, thanks. Likely will have no effect in non-I/O swamped
environment, but no regression expected either.
--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2011-10-05 07:37:00 | Re: Double sorting split patch |
| Previous Message | Greg Smith | 2011-10-05 07:02:12 | Re: Displaying accumulated autovacuum cost |