Re: ALTER TABLE lock strength reduction patch is unsafe

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: ALTER TABLE lock strength reduction patch is unsafe
Date: 2013-11-13 11:48:15
Message-ID: CA+U5nMJxGa3kJbCwsNBr9oPmUkkVR7zU5_TNjigbNCwyjMdxQA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 1 August 2013 01:53, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> wrote:

> A remediation strategy that seemed attractive when I last contemplated this
> problem is to repoint rd_att immediately but arrange to free the obsolete
> TupleDesc in AtEOXact_RelationCache().

I agree that the best way to resolve this is to retain a copy of the
TupleDesc, so that copied pointers to it remain valid.

EOXact is actually longer than strictly necessary in some cases, but
trying to work out a more minimal approach seems hard and possibly
inefficient.

Comments in relcache.c indicate that the Relation swapping concept
might be replaced by refcounting approach. I can't see how that
differs from your suggested route.

Which means I can't see any other way of doing this other than the way
you suggest. Will implement.

--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Heikki Linnakangas 2013-11-13 11:48:41 Re: GIN bugs in master branch
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2013-11-13 11:42:48 [PATCH] Report exit code from external recovery commands properly