Re: Proposal : REINDEX SCHEMA

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Sawada Masahiko <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Fabrízio Mello <fabriziomello(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Proposal : REINDEX SCHEMA
Date: 2014-11-18 16:37:20
Message-ID: CA+U5nMJdx4-HPYKk155=Tuz+saGnif7ZBraPDd-DYzUNVOpe0A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 23 October 2014 00:21, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:

>> Attached patch is latest version patch I modified above.
>> Also, I noticed I had forgotten to add the patch regarding document of
>> reindexdb.
>
> Please don't use pg_catalog in the regression test. That way we will
> need to update the expected file whenever a new catalog is added, which
> seems pointless. Maybe create a schema with a couple of tables
> specifically for this, instead.

These patches look fine to me. Don't see anybody objecting either.

Are you looking to commit them, or shall I?

--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alex Shulgin 2014-11-18 16:58:12 Re: Removing unreferenced files
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2014-11-18 16:08:05 Re: proposal: plpgsql - Assert statement