Re: Stalled news about ora2pg 11 on pg.org

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, PostgreSQL WWW <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Stalled news about ora2pg 11 on pg.org
Date: 2013-04-15 20:57:44
Message-ID: CA+U5nMJVvOXWvwsrw-y4w31TSp1_NM=FHLbWQnxgYeSzd6ZWfQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

On 15 April 2013 21:32, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> Simon Riggs wrote:
>> On 15 April 2013 21:18, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>> > That way nobody will notice that some things take 10 mins and others
>> > extended numbers of days.
>>
>> To my knowledge, this is the only list that suffers such huge
>> differences in moderation times. (Do we measure that?)
>
> Eh, list? Do you mean mailing list? I thought the problem here is
> about posting to the news section of the postgresql.org website.

Then clearly the problem happens in two places.

For me, delay is OK. What is difficult is not being able to predict
whether it will be 10 mins or 5 days. If it was always 5 days, that
would work perfectly. Clearly it can't always be 10 mins.

--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jonathan S. Katz 2013-04-15 22:58:10 Re: Stalled news about ora2pg 11 on pg.org
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2013-04-15 20:32:38 Re: Stalled news about ora2pg 11 on pg.org