Re: Standalone synchronous master

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, MauMau <maumau307(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)ymail(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>, Rajeev rastogi <rajeev(dot)rastogi(at)huawei(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Standalone synchronous master
Date: 2014-01-10 16:09:17
Message-ID: CA+U5nMJCCGEczyD4RpFExyeemEZgGfEs1tfnXqwtkwUHGa5M_Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 10 January 2014 15:47, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:

> I know there was a desire to remove this TODO item, but I think we have
> brought up enough new issues that we can keep it to see if we can come
> up with a solution.

Can you summarise what you think the new issues are? All I see is some
further rehashing of old discussions.

There is already a solution to the "problem" because the docs are
already very clear that you need multiple standbys to achieve commit
guarantees AND high availability. RTFM is usually used as some form of
put down, but that is what needs to happen here.

--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2014-01-10 16:15:14 Re: [ADMIN] Column missing from pg_statistics
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2014-01-10 15:55:39 Re: Add CREATE support to event triggers