Re: Add CREATE support to event triggers

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Add CREATE support to event triggers
Date: 2014-01-10 15:55:39
Message-ID: CA+U5nM+XwW5NjEbRNe6H1Ex8B9fn=Pv_WPSBZGaBqHFjH8=41Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 10 January 2014 15:48, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 10:36 AM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>> On 8 January 2014 20:42, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>>> CREATE SCHEMA IF NOT EXISTS "some schema" AUTHORIZATION "some guy";
>>
>> Hmm, given in 9.3 it was OK to have only DROP event triggers, I think
>> it should be equally acceptable to have just CREATE, but without every
>> option on CREATE. CREATE SCHEMA is easily the most complex thing here
>> and would be the command/event to deprioritise if we had any issues
>> getting this done/agreeing something for 9.4.
>
> I don't know that I agree with that, but I guess we can cross that
> bridge when we come to it.

We've come to it...

You would prefer either everything or nothing?? On what grounds?

--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2014-01-10 16:09:17 Re: Standalone synchronous master
Previous Message Robert Haas 2014-01-10 15:48:42 Re: Add CREATE support to event triggers