| From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: synchronous commit vs. hint bits |
| Date: | 2011-11-07 23:33:25 |
| Message-ID: | CA+U5nM+NqsZJ_L4ciDSH4p_y1NQZHk8=TNiW-aHUXCOR0Xs0=g@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 5:26 PM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>> 5. Make the WAL writer more responsive, maybe using latches, so that
>> it doesn't take as long for the commit record to make it out to disk.
>
> I'm working on this already as part of the update for power
> reduction/group commit/replication performance.
I extracted this from my current patch for you to test.
Rather useful actually 'cos its allowed me a sensible phasing of the
development.
--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| walwriter_latch.v2.patch | application/octet-stream | 4.9 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2011-11-08 02:35:23 | Re: synchronous commit vs. hint bits |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2011-11-07 20:03:05 | Re: unite recovery.conf and postgresql.conf |