Re: synchronous commit vs. hint bits

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: YAMAMOTO Takashi <yamt(at)mwd(dot)biglobe(dot)ne(dot)jp>
Cc: simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: synchronous commit vs. hint bits
Date: 2011-11-29 14:17:52
Message-ID: CA+TgmoYQgDnrhmbBnYRgW60wwd85D7kPZ5EK3=9vOtyfF3Ur-g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 1:42 AM, YAMAMOTO Takashi
<yamt(at)mwd(dot)biglobe(dot)ne(dot)jp> wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 5:26 PM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>>>> 5. Make the WAL writer more responsive, maybe using latches, so that
>>>> it doesn't take as long for the commit record to make it out to disk.
>>>
>>> I'm working on this already as part of the update for power
>>> reduction/group commit/replication performance.
>>
>> I extracted this from my current patch for you to test.
>
> is it expected to produce more frequent fsync?

Yes, I would expect that. What kind of increase are you seeing? Is
it causing a problem for you, or are you just making an observation?

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Stehule 2011-11-29 14:21:55 Re: review: CHECK FUNCTION statement
Previous Message Robert Haas 2011-11-29 14:16:23 Re: DOMAINs and CASTs