Re: Updating Sourceforge

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL www <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Updating Sourceforge
Date: 2013-04-11 19:33:02
Message-ID: CA+U5nM+5wkdC5BxPsyvFJL5HwXm33ABbCqkCvyJ9xKhJSksYbg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

On 11 April 2013 20:09, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:

> > This is a form of advocacy for the project, just like listing anywhere
> else.
>
> Is it really? Does anybody care about sourceforge these days?
>

I don't. But where would you list, if not there? Do we just give up trying
to maintain any external listings? (Or perhaps we never were bothered)

And is it good advocacy if people go there and download old versions?

I do take your point, that being out of date is worse than nothing at all.

But I think there is a place better than that, if we organise that.

--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jonathan S. Katz 2013-04-11 19:36:35 Re: Updating Sourceforge
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2013-04-11 19:09:43 Re: Updating Sourceforge