From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Ray Stell <stellr(at)cns(dot)vt(dot)edu> |
Cc: | pgsql-admin <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-docs <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: after failover? |
Date: | 2011-10-17 14:28:08 |
Message-ID: | CA+U5nM+3MmoBaiqPWhGTuqL_BLJukz5jzBfZc_gdGy01NoMb9w@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin pgsql-docs |
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 2:44 PM, Ray Stell <stellr(at)cns(dot)vt(dot)edu> wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 08:21:31PM +0100, Simon Riggs wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 3:02 PM, Ray Stell <stellr(at)cns(dot)vt(dot)edu> wrote:
>>
>> > The tutorial here excludes an important issue:
>> > http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Binary_Replication_Tutorial#Failing_Over_To_The_Standby
>> > After the failover is complete, it seems like a restart is required to
>> > make the new primary capable of supporting a new hot standby. ?Can the
>> > config values be changed without an interuption of service? ?I'm using
>> > a hotstandby config in 9.0.x. ?Anything different in this regard in 9.1?
>> > Thanks.
>>
>> There's no reason not to have wal_level = hot_standby on the standby also.
>
> That's helpful, thanks. Seems like a worthy addition to the doc and
> tutorial.
Doc patches welcome. Wiki changes can be made directly. Thanks.
--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Mark Keisler | 2011-10-17 15:20:02 | Re: Trying to use binary replication - from tutorial |
Previous Message | Ray Stell | 2011-10-17 13:44:56 | Re: after failover? |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2011-10-19 00:07:05 | Re: PQconninfoParse() |
Previous Message | Ray Stell | 2011-10-17 13:44:56 | Re: after failover? |