From: | Ray Stell <stellr(at)cns(dot)vt(dot)edu> |
---|---|
To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-admin <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: after failover? |
Date: | 2011-10-17 13:44:56 |
Message-ID: | 20111017134456.GA16432@cns.vt.edu |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin pgsql-docs |
On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 08:21:31PM +0100, Simon Riggs wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 3:02 PM, Ray Stell <stellr(at)cns(dot)vt(dot)edu> wrote:
>
> > The tutorial here excludes an important issue:
> > http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Binary_Replication_Tutorial#Failing_Over_To_The_Standby
> > After the failover is complete, it seems like a restart is required to
> > make the new primary capable of supporting a new hot standby. ?Can the
> > config values be changed without an interuption of service? ?I'm using
> > a hotstandby config in 9.0.x. ?Anything different in this regard in 9.1?
> > Thanks.
>
> There's no reason not to have wal_level = hot_standby on the standby also.
That's helpful, thanks. Seems like a worthy addition to the doc and
tutorial.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2011-10-17 14:28:08 | Re: after failover? |
Previous Message | Vibhor Kumar | 2011-10-17 10:54:02 | Re: flashback concept in postgres |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2011-10-17 14:28:08 | Re: after failover? |
Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2011-10-16 19:21:31 | Re: after failover? |