| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Paul Jungwirth <pj(at)illuminatedcomputing(dot)com>, PGSQL Mailing List <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: REFERENCES privilege should not be symmetric (was Re: [GENERAL] Postgres Permissions Article) |
| Date: | 2017-03-31 13:22:01 |
| Message-ID: | CA+Tgmobst9385gWq3g3LPkNn0NkbRk0CWPQD5YH1p2J6MaVJLQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 4:45 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> In short, it seems like this statement in the docs is correctly describing
> our code's behavior, but said behavior is wrong and should be changed.
> I'd propose fixing it like that in HEAD; I'm not sure if the back branches
> should also be changed.
Sounds reasonable, but I don't see much advantage to changing it in
the back-branches.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Thorsten Glaser | 2017-03-31 14:34:21 | Re: Debian Bug#859033: pg_dump: creates dumps that cannot be restored |
| Previous Message | Thomas Kellerer | 2017-03-31 12:10:34 | Do I need to COMMIT an analyze statement? |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Aleksander Alekseev | 2017-03-31 13:40:07 | Re: Multiple false-positive warnings from Valgrind |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2017-03-31 13:20:33 | Re: strange parallel query behavior after OOM crashes |