From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Kuntal Ghosh <kuntalghosh(dot)2007(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: strange parallel query behavior after OOM crashes |
Date: | 2017-03-31 13:20:33 |
Message-ID: | CA+TgmoatmyATzF-exF4Ttg9uuRTJmKsOydLndNeE+7Byp3i9Jw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 4:35 PM, Kuntal Ghosh
<kuntalghosh(dot)2007(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> 2. the server restarts automatically, initialize
> BackgroundWorkerData->parallel_register_count and
> BackgroundWorkerData->parallel_terminate_count in the shared memory.
> After that, it calls ForgetBackgroundWorker and it increments
> parallel_terminate_count.
Hmm. So this seems like the root of the problem. Presumably those
things need to be reset AFTER forgetting any background workers from
before the crash.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2017-03-31 13:22:01 | Re: REFERENCES privilege should not be symmetric (was Re: [GENERAL] Postgres Permissions Article) |
Previous Message | Konstantin Knizhnik | 2017-03-31 13:18:47 | Re: Parallel query execution with SPI |