Re: Allow relocatable extension to use @extschema@?

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Allow relocatable extension to use @extschema@?
Date: 2019-12-05 14:52:50
Message-ID: CA+TgmobqL083SmGnkh+e0RV4RjxzwdnPcYE4B0_1S18R=Qo0MA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 10:18 AM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> writes:
> > But nevertheless should we allow relocatable extension to use
> > @extschema(at)(dot) Any thoughts?
>
> No. The reasoning in the comment still holds good: if you embed
> @extschema@ in an object's definition, it becomes nonrelocatable.

That's demonstrably false, and the links included in the OP prove it.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2019-12-05 15:13:05 Re: Online checksums patch - once again
Previous Message Tom Lane 2019-12-05 14:50:50 Re: Update minimum SSL version