From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> |
Cc: | Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alastair Turner <minion(at)decodable(dot)me>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Count and log pages set all-frozen by vacuum |
Date: | 2024-10-31 15:56:41 |
Message-ID: | CA+TgmobcArUTo0d01wQV0mJ-=doU6LyNdUVaq_GuDU7QCKtF9A@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Oct 31, 2024 at 11:15 AM Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> wrote:
> Probably not, but I don't think that it's worth worrying about. ISTM
> that it's inevitable that somebody might get confused whenever we
> expose implementation details such as these. This particular example
> doesn't seem particularly concerning to me.
+1. We could possibly make this less confusing by reworking the output
so that we first talk about what the vacuuming did in one set of log
lines and then talk about what the truncation did afterward. But
that's a lot of work, and I don't feel like it's "must do" work.
--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alastair Turner | 2024-10-31 15:56:46 | Re: Count and log pages set all-frozen by vacuum |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2024-10-31 15:51:13 | Re: minor doc issue in 9.16.2.1.1. Boolean Predicate Check Expressions |