Re: pg_rewarm status

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jeff Amiel <becauseimjeff(at)yahoo(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_rewarm status
Date: 2013-12-17 14:34:19
Message-ID: CA+Tgmobc=C+5hiyj4aHPT=2XP-j5M3OOpCjA=QxdDFG0uFL21A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 12:09 AM, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I have used pg_prewarm during some of work related to Buffer Management and
> other performance related work. It is quite useful utility.
> +1 for reviving this patch for 9.4

Any other votes?

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2013-12-17 14:37:09 Re: Useless "Replica Identity: NOTHING" noise from psql \d
Previous Message Robert Haas 2013-12-17 14:33:36 Re: Why no INSTEAD OF triggers on tables?