Re: pg_rewarm status

From: "MauMau" <maumau307(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Robert Haas" <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Amit Kapila" <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "Jeff Janes" <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Jeff Amiel" <becauseimjeff(at)yahoo(dot)com>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_rewarm status
Date: 2013-12-17 20:31:47
Message-ID: 10FA5430C28A40F7BBD17E84B98438B6@maumau
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

From: "Robert Haas" <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
> On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 12:09 AM, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
> wrote:
>> I have used pg_prewarm during some of work related to Buffer Management
>> and
>> other performance related work. It is quite useful utility.
>> +1 for reviving this patch for 9.4
>
> Any other votes?

+1
Some customers requested:

1. fill the database cache with frequently accessed data before starting or
resuming service for their users (for the first time or after maintenance
work), so that they can provide steady and predictable performance.

2. pin some (reference or master) data in the database cache not to be
evicted from the cache (like Oracle's KEEP buffer?), for the same reason as
1.

I'd love such useful feature like pg_rewarm to be included in core. I hope
such nice features won't be rejected just because there are already similar
external tools.

Regards
MauMau

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2013-12-17 20:33:41 Re: pg_rewarm status
Previous Message Marko Kreen 2013-12-17 20:26:48 Re: SSL: better default ciphersuite