| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Jelte Fennema-Nio <me(at)jeltef(dot)nl>, Jacob Burroughs <jburroughs(at)instructure(dot)com>, Dave Cramer <davecramer(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, "Andrey M(dot) Borodin" <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Add new protocol message to change GUCs for usage with future protocol-only GUCs |
| Date: | 2024-05-23 19:45:26 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmobbExv7OcOTErK-VzPNBC+6Rj6de171c+roXKSjBEFcBA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, May 23, 2024 at 2:12 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> I got around to looking through this thread in preparation for next
> week's patch review session. I have a couple of opinions to offer:
I agree with these opinions. Independently of that, I'm glad you shared them.
I think part of the reason we ended up with the protocol parameters =
GUCs thing is because you seemed to be concurring with that approach
upthread. I think it was Jelte's idea originally, but I interpreted
some of your earlier remarks to be supporting it. I'm not sure whether
you've revised your opinion, or just refined it, or whether we
misinterpreted your earlier remarks.
--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Pavel Stehule | 2024-05-23 19:46:31 | Re: Schema variables - new implementation for Postgres 15 |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2024-05-23 18:40:02 | Re: Add new protocol message to change GUCs for usage with future protocol-only GUCs |