| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, Ayush Vatsa <ayushvatsa1810(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Clarification on Role Access Rights to Table Indexes |
| Date: | 2025-02-18 16:21:33 |
| Message-ID: | CA+Tgmob_W0iq9Kuugra3WYTO2429RMJ_+HkVukrXWOUN81QiEw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Feb 18, 2025 at 11:02 AM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Is that a +1 for the specific design of "check SELECT on the index's
> table", or just a +1 for changing something here?
That is a +1 for the specific design of "check SELECT on the index's
table". I don't want to be closed-minded: if you have some strong
reason for believing that's the wrong thing to do, I'm all ears.
However, I'm presently of the view that it is exactly the right thing
to do, to the point where I don't currently understand why there's
anything to think about here.
--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2025-02-18 16:30:02 | Re: Clarification on Role Access Rights to Table Indexes |
| Previous Message | Adrian Klaver | 2025-02-18 16:21:21 | Re: Doubts regarding pg_freespacemap extension |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ranier Vilela | 2025-02-18 16:29:45 | Re: Improve cleaning files on Postgres crashes |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2025-02-18 16:21:14 | Re: Improve cleaning files on Postgres crashes |