| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: making EXPLAIN extensible |
| Date: | 2025-03-05 17:57:06 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmobPz9phD5PpXeUNTSrkc9uXkRg6Gfq6gPatpA-XTaQCcw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Mar 5, 2025 at 12:20 PM Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> wrote:
> I didn't look into the technical details to see what might be required
> to allow that kind of collaboration, and I am not suggesting you
> redesign the entire feature around that idea.
OK. It sounds to me like there is a good amount of support for going
forward with something like what I have, even though some people might
also like other things. What I feel is currently lacking is some
review of the actual code. Would anyone like to do that?
Here is a v2 with some documentation and regression tests for
pg_overexplain added.
--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| v2-0002-Add-some-new-hooks-so-extensions-can-add-details-.patch | application/octet-stream | 5.7 KB |
| v2-0003-pg_overexplain-Additional-EXPLAIN-options-for-deb.patch | application/octet-stream | 59.0 KB |
| v2-0001-Make-it-possible-for-loadable-modules-to-add-EXPL.patch | application/octet-stream | 28.7 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2025-03-05 18:03:16 | Re: Should we add debug_parallel_query=regress to CI? |
| Previous Message | Jeff Davis | 2025-03-05 17:52:29 | Re: making EXPLAIN extensible |