Re: [multithreading] extension compatibility

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Tristan Partin <tristan(at)partin(dot)io>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [multithreading] extension compatibility
Date: 2024-06-13 19:23:25
Message-ID: CA+TgmobFJJTrnq2H5ii0-FQOpoZqo4VSQ8=-dX=Cw49aV3mq5g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Jun 6, 2024 at 10:32 AM Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi> wrote:
> > Well, OK, so it sounds like I'm outvoted, at least at the moment.
> > Maybe that will change as more people vote, but for now, that's where
> > we are. Given that, I suppose we want something more like Tristan's
> > patch, but with a more extensible syntax. Does that sound right?
>
> +1

So, how shall we proceed here? Tristan, do you want to update your
patch based on this feedback?

--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jacob Champion 2024-06-13 19:28:42 Re: RFC: adding pytest as a supported test framework
Previous Message Robert Haas 2024-06-13 19:21:09 Re: RFC: adding pytest as a supported test framework