| From: | Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Tristan Partin <tristan(at)partin(dot)io>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: [multithreading] extension compatibility |
| Date: | 2024-06-06 14:32:12 |
| Message-ID: | 7a67170e-b3bd-427a-87d3-70bc60cab5f9@iki.fi |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 06/06/2024 17:23, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 6, 2024 at 5:00 AM Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi> wrote:
>> If there is some material harm from compiling with multithreading
>> support even if you're not using it, we should try to fix that. I'm not
>> dead set against having a compile-time option, but I don't see the need
>> for it at the moment.
>
> Well, OK, so it sounds like I'm outvoted, at least at the moment.
> Maybe that will change as more people vote, but for now, that's where
> we are. Given that, I suppose we want something more like Tristan's
> patch, but with a more extensible syntax. Does that sound right?
+1
--
Heikki Linnakangas
Neon (https://neon.tech)
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2024-06-06 14:34:07 | report on not thread-safe functions |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2024-06-06 14:29:59 | Re: Things I don't like about \du's "Attributes" column |