Re: Server-side base backup: why superuser, not pg_write_server_files?

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker <ilmari(at)ilmari(dot)org>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Server-side base backup: why superuser, not pg_write_server_files?
Date: 2022-02-02 15:57:28
Message-ID: CA+TgmobD8EUQnsd8a6v-0i_uF5kk189MsonH==nGWg-BXEjNug@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Feb 2, 2022 at 10:42 AM Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker
<ilmari(at)ilmari(dot)org> wrote:
> Here's a follow-on patch that adds a test for non-superuser server-side
> basebackup, which crashes without your patch and passes with it.

This seems like a good idea, but I'm not going to slip a change from
an exact test count to done_testing() into a commit on some other
topic...

--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Julien Rouhaud 2022-02-02 15:57:51 Re: pg_receivewal - couple of improvements
Previous Message Robert Haas 2022-02-02 15:55:53 Re: refactoring basebackup.c