Re: Server-side base backup: why superuser, not pg_write_server_files?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker <ilmari(at)ilmari(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Server-side base backup: why superuser, not pg_write_server_files?
Date: 2022-02-02 17:55:52
Message-ID: 15387.1643824552@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> This seems like a good idea, but I'm not going to slip a change from
> an exact test count to done_testing() into a commit on some other
> topic...

Actually, it seemed that the consensus in the nearby thread [1]
was to start doing exactly that, rather than try to convert them
all in one big push.

regards, tom lane

[1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/9D4FFB61-392B-4A2C-B7E4-911797B4AC14%40yesql.se

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Julien Rouhaud 2022-02-02 17:56:56 Re: 2022-01 Commitfest
Previous Message Jaime Casanova 2022-02-02 17:45:40 Re: 2022-01 Commitfest