From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Arseny Sher <a(dot)sher(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Indexes on partitioned tables and foreign partitions |
Date: | 2018-05-13 12:59:45 |
Message-ID: | CA+Tgmob6f6XTEnFuo8o_=J0vL5ig7ecNRQcmmjT1LtOWVDc4uA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 8:52 AM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> I think its reasonable to expect you interpret my words sensibly,
> rather than in some more dramatic form where I seem to break rules
> with every phrase.
Sure, I agree. I try to interpret the words of everyone here sensibly
and without unnecessary drama.
I don't really know why we're still talking about this. My principle
concern here has never been to understand whether or not you were
proposing foreign indexes for v11 -- although I have now got a very
clear idea that you weren't -- but to resolve the actual problem --
which seems to be a bug in 8b08f7d4. I regret that we seem to have
gotten sucked into a conversation about whether I was being
unreasonable in thinking that you might have meant what I thought you
might have meant for a period of 3 hours last Wednesday, rather than
about the technical issue. I apologize to you and to the list for my
contribution to that state of affairs.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2018-05-13 13:01:10 | Re: Why does load_external_function() return PGFunction? |
Previous Message | Amit Kapila | 2018-05-13 11:25:35 | Re: Postgres 11 release notes |