Re: Indexes on partitioned tables and foreign partitions

On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 8:52 AM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> I think its reasonable to expect you interpret my words sensibly,
> rather than in some more dramatic form where I seem to break rules
> with every phrase.

Sure, I agree. I try to interpret the words of everyone here sensibly
and without unnecessary drama.

I don't really know why we're still talking about this. My principle
concern here has never been to understand whether or not you were
proposing foreign indexes for v11 -- although I have now got a very
clear idea that you weren't -- but to resolve the actual problem --
which seems to be a bug in 8b08f7d4. I regret that we seem to have
gotten sucked into a conversation about whether I was being
unreasonable in thinking that you might have meant what I thought you
might have meant for a period of 3 hours last Wednesday, rather than
about the technical issue. I apologize to you and to the list for my
contribution to that state of affairs.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company