Re: Speed up clean meson builds by ~25%

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres(at)jeltef(dot)nl>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Nazir Bilal Yavuz <byavuz81(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alexander Lakhin <exclusion(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Speed up clean meson builds by ~25%
Date: 2024-05-17 21:01:31
Message-ID: CA+Tgmob32Xzf_fVFZNN3=aR3KbqGUG+WvWE2byN2dXxg2EdUcw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, May 17, 2024 at 4:59 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> As I mentioned upthread, I'm more worried about confusing error
> reports than the machine time.

Well, Jelte fixed that.

> I grant that there are people who are more affected, but still, I'd
> just as soon not contort the build rules for a temporary problem.

Arguably by doing this, but I don't think it's enough of a contortion
to get excited about.

Anyone else want to vote?

--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2024-05-17 21:05:49 Re: commitfest.postgresql.org is no longer fit for purpose
Previous Message Tom Lane 2024-05-17 20:59:08 Re: Speed up clean meson builds by ~25%