From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres(at)jeltef(dot)nl>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Nazir Bilal Yavuz <byavuz81(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alexander Lakhin <exclusion(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Speed up clean meson builds by ~25% |
Date: | 2024-05-17 21:01:31 |
Message-ID: | CA+Tgmob32Xzf_fVFZNN3=aR3KbqGUG+WvWE2byN2dXxg2EdUcw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, May 17, 2024 at 4:59 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> As I mentioned upthread, I'm more worried about confusing error
> reports than the machine time.
Well, Jelte fixed that.
> I grant that there are people who are more affected, but still, I'd
> just as soon not contort the build rules for a temporary problem.
Arguably by doing this, but I don't think it's enough of a contortion
to get excited about.
Anyone else want to vote?
--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2024-05-17 21:05:49 | Re: commitfest.postgresql.org is no longer fit for purpose |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2024-05-17 20:59:08 | Re: Speed up clean meson builds by ~25% |