| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Greg Sabino Mullane <htamfids(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>, Jacob Champion <jacob(dot)champion(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: commitfest.postgresql.org is no longer fit for purpose |
| Date: | 2024-05-17 21:05:49 |
| Message-ID: | 2552835.1715979949@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Fri, May 17, 2024 at 3:51 PM Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at> wrote:
>> I think it is a good rule. I don't think that it shouldn't lead to putting
>> people on the pillory or kicking their patches, but I imagine that a committer
>> looking for somebody else's patch to work on could prefer patches by people
>> who are doing their share of reviews.
> If you give me an automated way to find that out, I'll consider paying
> some attention to it.
Yeah, I can't imagine that any committer (or reviewer, really) is
doing any such thing, because it would take far too much effort to
figure out how much work anyone else is doing. I see CFMs reminding
everybody that this rule exists, but I don't think they ever try to
check it either. It's pretty much the honor system, and I'm sure
some folk ignore it.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Pavel Borisov | 2024-05-17 21:08:03 | Re: [PATCH] Improve amcheck to also check UNIQUE constraint in btree index. |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2024-05-17 21:01:31 | Re: Speed up clean meson builds by ~25% |