Re: lwlocknames.h beautification attempt

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
Cc: Gurjeet Singh <gurjeet(at)singh(dot)im>, Postgres Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: lwlocknames.h beautification attempt
Date: 2025-03-17 02:53:25
Message-ID: CA+Tgmob=Sh-RjVTVnFsOn_XuP-qjJZFD3ktZqzyj-OXMYFXZEg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Mar 14, 2025 at 3:38 PM Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> wrote:
> I forgot to send a note here that I pushed this patch. Thank you.

I'm confused. Tom and I both said we didn't like this change, so you
committed the patch without further discussion?

I mean, this is a pretty unimportant detail, so I don't really want to
fight about it too much, but that really doesn't seem like a consensus
to me.

--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2025-03-17 03:12:35 Re: PATCH: warn about, and deprecate, clear text passwords
Previous Message Robert Haas 2025-03-17 02:49:49 Re: TOAST versus toast