Re: lwlocknames.h beautification attempt

On 2025-Mar-16, Robert Haas wrote:

> On Fri, Mar 14, 2025 at 3:38 PM Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> wrote:
> > I forgot to send a note here that I pushed this patch. Thank you.
>
> I'm confused. Tom and I both said we didn't like this change, so you
> committed the patch without further discussion?

Tom didn't say he didn't like this change. He said he didn't like a
different change, which is not the one I committed. And your opinion
was quite thin on arguments, and you didn't reply for 11 days after I
expressed intention to apply a simplified version of Gurjeet's patch.

> I mean, this is a pretty unimportant detail, so I don't really want to
> fight about it too much, but that really doesn't seem like a consensus
> to me.

Would you have objected if I had proposed to use that style to begin with?
You can see that the thread where this was discussed [1] was pretty
light on coding style/output style discussion. It seems hard to argue
that the original had achieved any kind of consensus.

[1] https://postgr.es/m/202401231025.gbv4nnte5fmm@alvherre.pgsql

--
Álvaro Herrera 48°01'N 7°57'E — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/