From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Shruthi Gowda <gowdashru(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: pg15b2: large objects lost on upgrade |
Date: | 2022-08-04 19:32:00 |
Message-ID: | CA+TgmoaqkUN=RP9ReACus9O7r4mtCSnv+e45v1iQUrHC_+9Vdw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Aug 4, 2022 at 3:10 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > I think the most practical alternative is to put this file back to the
> > way it was before I started tinkering with it, and revisit this issue
> > after the release.
>
> Yeah, that seems like the right thing. We are running too low on time
> to have any confidence that a modified version of the test will be
> reliable.
Done.
--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2022-08-04 19:52:34 | Re: pg15b2: large objects lost on upgrade |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2022-08-04 19:31:39 | Re: pg15b2: large objects lost on upgrade |