| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Shruthi Gowda <gowdashru(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: pg15b2: large objects lost on upgrade |
| Date: | 2022-08-04 19:10:52 |
| Message-ID: | 3628089.1659640252@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> I think the most practical alternative is to put this file back to the
> way it was before I started tinkering with it, and revisit this issue
> after the release.
Yeah, that seems like the right thing. We are running too low on time
to have any confidence that a modified version of the test will be
reliable.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2022-08-04 19:15:20 | Re: pg15b2: large objects lost on upgrade |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2022-08-04 19:02:10 | Re: pg15b2: large objects lost on upgrade |