Re: Add new protocol message to change GUCs for usage with future protocol-only GUCs

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Jacob Champion <jacob(dot)champion(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres(at)jeltef(dot)nl>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Jacob Burroughs <jburroughs(at)instructure(dot)com>, Dave Cramer <davecramer(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, "Andrey M(dot) Borodin" <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, Daniele Varrazzo <daniele(dot)varrazzo(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Add new protocol message to change GUCs for usage with future protocol-only GUCs
Date: 2024-09-09 15:57:31
Message-ID: CA+TgmoapwXi6iX774NQvPNMsqJgWTeFtADQhZSEe=N-MGWhjxg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Aug 26, 2024 at 8:40 AM Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 23, 2024 at 3:40 PM Jacob Champion
> <jacob(dot)champion(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> > Agreed on the name. I've attached a reconfigured version of v15-0003,
> > with an extension that should hopefully not throw off the cfbot, and a
> > commit message that should hopefully not misrepresent the discussion
> > so far?
>
> LGTM. Objections?

Hearing none, committed.

--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2024-09-09 15:58:34 Re: Make query cancellation keys longer
Previous Message Michael Banck 2024-09-09 15:36:39 Re: Use streaming read API in ANALYZE