| From: | Michael Banck <mbanck(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Mats Kindahl <mats(at)timescale(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com>, Nazir Bilal Yavuz <byavuz81(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, jakub(dot)wartak(at)enterprisedb(dot)com |
| Subject: | Re: Use streaming read API in ANALYZE |
| Date: | 2024-09-09 15:36:39 |
| Message-ID: | 66df1607.170a0220.241343.aae8@mx.google.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On Thu, Sep 05, 2024 at 09:12:07PM +1200, Thomas Munro wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 5, 2024 at 6:45 PM Mats Kindahl <mats(at)timescale(dot)com> wrote:
> > Making the ReadStream API non-opaque (that is, moving the definition
> > to the header file) would at least solve our problem (unless I am
> > mistaken). However, I am ignorant about long-term plans which might
> > affect this, so there might be a good reason to revert it for
> > reasons I am not aware of.
>
> The second thing.
I am a bit confused about the status of this thread. Robert mentioned
RC1, so I guess it pertains to v17 but I don't see it on the open item
wiki list?
Does the above mean you are going to revert it for v17, Thomas? And if
so, what exactly? The ANALYZE changes on top of the streaming read API
or something else about that API that is being discussed on this thread?
I am also asking because this feature (i.e. Use streaming read API in
ANALYZE) is being mentioned in the release announcement and that was
just frozen for translations.
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2024-09-09 15:57:31 | Re: Add new protocol message to change GUCs for usage with future protocol-only GUCs |
| Previous Message | Jacob Champion | 2024-09-09 15:29:17 | [PATCH] Fix small overread during SASLprep |