Re: pgsql: Harden new test case against force_parallel_mode = regress.

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pgsql: Harden new test case against force_parallel_mode = regress.
Date: 2023-03-03 17:56:23
Message-ID: CA+TgmoaiimSJsLE6kfL_9EwYHfpK474aMWP3aUeJUDnM556QEQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Mar 3, 2023 at 12:46 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Couldn't we install the leader's snapshot into both transactions?

Yeah, maybe that would Just Work. Not sure.

--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2023-03-03 18:03:31 Re: pgsql: Harden new test case against force_parallel_mode = regress.
Previous Message Robert Haas 2023-03-03 17:52:51 pgsql: Update some incorrect comments about xlog records.

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2023-03-03 18:03:31 Re: pgsql: Harden new test case against force_parallel_mode = regress.
Previous Message Tom Lane 2023-03-03 17:55:16 Re: libpq: PQgetCopyData() and allocation overhead