| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pgsql: Harden new test case against force_parallel_mode = regress. |
| Date: | 2023-03-03 18:03:31 |
| Message-ID: | 2506573.1677866611@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Fri, Mar 3, 2023 at 12:46 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Couldn't we install the leader's snapshot into both transactions?
> Yeah, maybe that would Just Work. Not sure.
Well, IIUC the worker is currently getting a brand new snapshot
for its startup transaction, which is exactly what you said upthread
it should never do. Seems like that could have more failure modes
than just this one.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2023-03-04 17:12:03 | pgsql: Tighten header pre-inclusions in headerscheck and cpluspluscheck |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2023-03-03 17:56:23 | Re: pgsql: Harden new test case against force_parallel_mode = regress. |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jeroen Vermeulen | 2023-03-03 18:25:48 | Re: libpq: PQgetCopyData() and allocation overhead |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2023-03-03 17:56:23 | Re: pgsql: Harden new test case against force_parallel_mode = regress. |