From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Aleksander Alekseev <a(dot)alekseev(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Small patch: Change calling convention for ShmemInitHash (and fix possible bug) |
Date: | 2016-03-25 12:17:15 |
Message-ID: | CA+TgmoagyCi_Oqen3KisK-_W8JO-v2YLuocAOa4UVkwoeDr_Hg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 9:50 AM, Aleksander Alekseev
<a(dot)alekseev(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> wrote:
> I would like to continue discussion regarding changing calling
> convention for ShmemInitHash procedure:
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CA+TgmoZm=Uowt8a_XaSfooGwufeeLJ861NTADiCEOpyFehV8Wg@mail.gmail.com
>
> Currently this procedure has two arguments --- init_size and max_size.
> But since shared hash tables have fixed size there is little sense to
> pass two arguments. In fact currently ShmemInitHash is always called
> with init_size == max_size with only one exception, InitLocks procedure
> (see lock.c), which I believe is actually a bug.
No, I think we left it that way on purpose. I don't remember the
discussion exactly, but I don't think it's hurting anything.
> Patch is attached.
>
> What do you think?
I don't think this actually buys us anything.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2016-03-25 12:20:15 | Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2 |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2016-03-25 12:15:51 | Re: Small patch: fix code duplication in heapam.c |