From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: ERROR: ORDER/GROUP BY expression not found in targetlist |
Date: | 2016-06-16 17:13:52 |
Message-ID: | CA+TgmoadCT-mRmMhmJw9itsn-xSQaYxhyo_pBkgwrfLVUqPhmA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 12:50 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 9:26 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>> 3. In https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/25521.1465837597@sss.pgh.pa.us
>>> Tom proposed adding a GUC to set the minimum relation size required
>>> for consideration of parallelism.
>
>> I have posted a patch for this upthread [3]. The main thing to verify is
>> the default value of guc.
>
> I'll review and push this patch, unless Robert or somebody else has
> already started on it.
Great, it's all yours.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2016-06-16 17:44:34 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: pgsql: Avoid extra locks in GetSnapshotData if old_snapshot_threshold < |
Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2016-06-16 16:54:40 | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Avoid extra locks in GetSnapshotData if old_snapshot_threshold < |