| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: ERROR: ORDER/GROUP BY expression not found in targetlist |
| Date: | 2016-06-16 16:50:03 |
| Message-ID: | 1922.1466095803@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 9:26 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> 3. In https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/25521.1465837597@sss.pgh.pa.us
>> Tom proposed adding a GUC to set the minimum relation size required
>> for consideration of parallelism.
> I have posted a patch for this upthread [3]. The main thing to verify is
> the default value of guc.
I'll review and push this patch, unless Robert or somebody else has
already started on it. I concur with your choice of setting the default
value to 1024 blocks; that's close to the existing behavior but as a power
of 2 will look cleaner in GUC size units.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2016-06-16 16:54:40 | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Avoid extra locks in GetSnapshotData if old_snapshot_threshold < |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2016-06-16 16:43:34 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: pgsql: Avoid extra locks in GetSnapshotData if old_snapshot_threshold < |