Re: libpq compression (part 3)

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Jacob Burroughs <jburroughs(at)instructure(dot)com>
Cc: Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres(at)jeltef(dot)nl>, Jacob Champion <jacob(dot)champion(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: libpq compression (part 3)
Date: 2024-05-20 15:17:30
Message-ID: CA+TgmoadAacorm90nuDV4SWUU1PZLqNsWz4DvYg=aVZKuP2KYQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, May 18, 2024 at 1:18 AM Jacob Burroughs
<jburroughs(at)instructure(dot)com> wrote:
> I like this more than what I proposed, and will update the patches to
> reflect this proposal. (I've gotten them locally back into a state of
> applying cleanly and dealing with the changes needed to support direct
> SSL connections, so refactoring the protocol layer shouldn't be too
> hard now.)

Sounds good!

--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message PG Doc comments form 2024-05-20 15:26:27 Ambiguous description on new columns
Previous Message Robert Haas 2024-05-20 15:12:34 Re: Shared detoast Datum proposal