From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: pgsql: Prevent instability in contrib/pageinspect's regression test. |
Date: | 2022-11-21 17:52:01 |
Message-ID: | CA+TgmoaYMUv1ab2vAh7AoSUqUYHtPx9Cmehue2=JCXO3gvsDbw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 12:35 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> I wrote:
> > Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> >> Looks like a chunk of the buildfarm doesn't like this - presumably because
> >> they use force_parallel_mode = regress. Seems ok to just force that to off in
> >> this test?
>
> > Ugh ... didn't occur to me to try that. I'll take a look.
>
> Hmm, so the problem is:
>
> SELECT octet_length(get_raw_page('test1', 'main', 0)) AS main_0;
> ERROR: cannot access temporary tables during a parallel operation
>
> Why in the world is get_raw_page() marked as parallel safe?
> It clearly isn't, given this restriction.
I suspect that restriction was overlooked when evaluating the marking
of this function.
--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2022-11-21 18:08:58 | Re: pgsql: Prevent instability in contrib/pageinspect's regression test. |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2022-11-21 17:35:15 | Re: pgsql: Prevent instability in contrib/pageinspect's regression test. |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2022-11-21 18:08:58 | Re: pgsql: Prevent instability in contrib/pageinspect's regression test. |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2022-11-21 17:45:55 | Re: Damage control for planner's get_actual_variable_endpoint() runaway |