| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Pavel Luzanov <p(dot)luzanov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> |
| Cc: | Rafia Sabih <rafia(dot)pghackers(at)gmail(dot)com>, "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Jim Nasby <jim(dot)nasby(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Things I don't like about \du's "Attributes" column |
| Date: | 2024-07-16 13:24:37 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoaXrDKZoucBVETyC0MVmR_JWUBeYWvWXi=pxm8ZEd=7GQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jul 16, 2024 at 4:53 AM Pavel Luzanov <p(dot)luzanov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> wrote:
> On 15.07.2024 12:50, Rafia Sabih wrote:
> Well, it was just my opinion of how I would have liked it better, but
> of course you may decide against it, there is no strong feeling around
> it.
> And if you are on the fence with the opinion of having them in normal
> or extended mode, then maybe we can ask more people to chip in.
>
> I am not against moving "Valid until" and "Connection limit" to extended mode.
> It just seemed to me that without these two columns, the output of the command
> is too short, so there is no reason in hiding them.
>
> But you are right, we need more opinions.
Which version of the patch is currently under discussion?
--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Floris Van Nee | 2024-07-16 13:36:33 | RE: temp table on commit delete rows performance issue |
| Previous Message | vignesh C | 2024-07-16 13:24:07 | Re: long-standing data loss bug in initial sync of logical replication |