From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, pgsql-committers <pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: pgsql: psql: fix \connect with URIs and conninfo strings |
Date: | 2015-04-02 14:41:55 |
Message-ID: | CA+TgmoaTvVKk_8W_m_cYsZ2ehvnRX3_mg+k8R2YEy1_51mFQAw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-committers |
On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 10:38 AM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 10:19:51AM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 10:09 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> > Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> >> On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 10:00 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> >>> I'm going to revert that commit in HEAD shortly, unless Alvaro pops
>> >>> up and promises a fix PDQ. Or you could do the same.
>> >
>> >> I was thinking of changing master to look like the 9.4 version.
>> >
>> > [ shrug... ] IMO, a quick "git revert" is less work and leaves a cleaner
>> > state for Alvaro to apply whatever final solution he settles on.
>> > But do what you wish.
>>
>> OK, I've just reverted it.
>
> Can I ask about the logic of why this bug fix was backpatched, or is
> that clear to everyone but me.
What is your question, exactly? There was a fair amount of discussion
of whether and how to back-patch this on pgsql-hackers.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2015-04-02 14:42:58 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Centralize definition of integer limits. |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2015-04-02 14:38:43 | Re: pgsql: psql: fix \connect with URIs and conninfo strings |