| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr> |
| Cc: | "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: extensible options syntax for replication parser? |
| Date: | 2021-09-21 16:27:21 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoaSmHBO3pFwk_9fZa+iM1bY_4oq5WGMdNJcVnu+gXj61g@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 3:44 PM Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Last call for complaints about either the overall direction or the
> specific implementation choices...
A complaint showed up over at
http://postgr.es/m/979131631633278@mail.yandex.ru and pursuant to that
complaint I have made the new syntax for controlling the checkpoint
type look like CHECKPOINT { 'fast' | 'spread' } rather than just
having an option called FAST. It was suggested over there to also
rename WAIT to WAIT_WAL_ARCHIVED, but I don't like that for reasons
explained on that thread and so have not adopted that proposal.
Sergei also helpfully pointed out that I'd accidentally deleted a
version check in one place, so this version is also updated to not do
that.
--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| v6-0001-Flexible-options-for-BASE_BACKUP.patch | application/octet-stream | 25.3 KB |
| v6-0002-Flexible-options-for-CREATE_REPLICATION_SLOT.patch | application/octet-stream | 16.4 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2021-09-21 16:51:55 | Re: refactoring basebackup.c |
| Previous Message | Pavel Stehule | 2021-09-21 16:20:52 | Re: proposal: possibility to read dumped table's name from file |