Re: Large number of open(2) calls with bulk INSERT into empty table

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Florian Weimer <fweimer(at)bfk(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Large number of open(2) calls with bulk INSERT into empty table
Date: 2012-08-20 19:19:59
Message-ID: CA+TgmoaJAH0_7=DO8nm2yUDZCqoSf6B=UdTz=1VZSChH667C=Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 9:05 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> A TODO for this?

You mean this part?

>> On the other hand, the problem of the FSM taking up 24kB for an 8kB
>> table seems clearly worth fixing, but I don't think I have the cycles
>> for it at present. Maybe a TODO is in order.

I certainly think that'd be worth a TODO. Whether the rest of this is
worth worrying about I'm not sure.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2012-08-20 19:22:04 Re: The pgrminclude problem
Previous Message Robert Haas 2012-08-20 19:11:51 Re: Timing overhead and Linux clock sources