Re: Timing overhead and Linux clock sources

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Ants Aasma <ants(dot)aasma(at)eesti(dot)ee>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Timing overhead and Linux clock sources
Date: 2012-08-20 19:11:51
Message-ID: CA+TgmoYicz6pM1ZVKciSNaHYfHziUfH72aQ6J66VdzX1BemXFQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 10:28 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> FYI, I am planning to go ahead and package this tool in /contrib for PG
> 9.3.

Isn't this exactly what we already did, in 9.2, in the form of
contrib/pg_test_timing?

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2012-08-20 19:19:59 Re: Large number of open(2) calls with bulk INSERT into empty table
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2012-08-20 19:10:52 Re: sha1, sha2 functions into core?